Secondary bibliographic line attributed to Don Miguel Perez de Mendoza and transmitted in Thimm as a supposed Madrid 1665 printed work. Leguina 1891 explicitly rejects the supposed printed 1665 witness and instead treats the related material as manuscript, so this record should be read as a doubtful bibliographic claim rather than a secure independent printed book.
Vigeant 1882 also transmits a Madrid 1665 quarto line under Miguel Perez, titled Dexterite dans les armes, adding another secondary bibliographic witness to this doubtful printed record family.